Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025

The Global Assessment Report (GAR) on Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) 2025 highlights that disasters, both natural and human-made, pose a serious threat to lives, livelihoods, and development, especially in vulnerable countries. Least developed countries, landlocked developing countries, and small island developing states face steep challenges in disaster risk reduction, often limited by resources and technical capacity despite strong commitment. The report stresses that proactive investment in resilience, risk-informed planning, and sustainable development is essential to break cycles of repeated losses. GAR 2025 calls on governments, communities, and the private sector to strengthen resilience and better protect lives, infrastructure, and economies. 

Recent events, including the March 2025 earthquake in Myanmar and October and November cyclones in the Philippines, highlight the urgency of investing in resilience.

Link to the report: https://www.undrr.org/gar/gar2025
Citation: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2025). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025: Resilience Pays: Financing and Investing for our Future. Geneva.

PRINT ISBN: 9789211542561
PDF ISBN: 9789211576740
 

Hnin Ei Lwin
#Monitoring #Evaluation #Reporting #Research #MEARL
#social #development #humanitarian #publichealth 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

EVALUATION HANDBOOK - 2024 (EU Publications)

Image
The primary audience for this evaluation handbook includes: Evaluation managers in European Union (EU) delegations and at headquarters, Monitoring and evaluation focal points in EU delegations, and  External evaluation teams and contractors It builds upon the Better Regulation Guidelines (European Commission (EC), 2021a) and the Better Regulation Toolbox (EC, 2023), along with other pertinent EC guidance such as the Results-Oriented Monitoring (ROM) Guidelines, the Evaluation ToR templates and guidance, and various methodological notes issued by the Directorate-General for International Partnerships (DG INTPA) and the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments (FPI). Furthermore, the handbook integrates information from external (non-EC) sources, all of which are fully referenced and/or hyperlinked within the document for further reading. Evaluation Handbook:  https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/06350947-4d56-11ef-acbc-01aa75ed71a1/language-en# ISBN 978-92-68-...
Read more

INTERSECTIONALITY WHEELS: Then and Now

Image
Back in 2009, the Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women (CRIAW-ICREF) developed the Intersectionality Wheel for their publication, Everyone Belongs: A Toolkit for Applying Intersectionality. The goal was to illustrate how various facets of discrimination and social identity come together in people’s lives. Lately, The Equality Institute has refined this model. Their version focuses on a person’s life stages, from infancy to adulthood, and shows how these stages intersect with identities like race, gender, disability, and Indigenous status, while also considering broader systemic challenges such as racism, sexism, and colonialism. Included in the 2022 publication of the UN Women and UN PRPD Intersectionality Resource Guide and Toolkit, this version highlights that a person’s experiences are ever-changing and never fixed. It further deepens the understanding of how power, identity, and social context evolve throughout one’s life. Hnin Ei Lwin #Monitoring   #Evaluat...
Read more

Data Quality in Emergencies: Field-Level Challenges and Mitigation Strategies

Image
In emergency response, the quality of our data and reporting plays a critical role in how we plan, allocate resources, and respond to people in urgent need. High-quality data helps ensure our actions are informed, timely, and equitable. However, when data collection methodologies are weak or inconsistent, the consequences can be significant: - Data may not be valid, leading to unreliable conclusions. - Assessments may be inaccurate or unnecessarily repeated. - Accessible areas are often oversampled, while harder-to-reach communities are left out. - Vulnerable groups risk being excluded. - Programs may rely on assumptions rather than actual evidence. To support field teams and strengthen MEARL practices in these complex environments, I developed a contextualized resource that outlines key challenges and practical mitigation strategies for rapid needs assessments in conflict-affected emergencies. While grounded in the Myanmar context, I believe the insights are relevant across many hum...
Read more